For my fourth reflection I am going to explore the relationships between imperialism and colonialism, the differences between the two, and explain how it is or has been shown in our society today. Edward Saïd relates imperialism with European cultures and how certain practices of ideas, thoughts, beliefs and rituals make meaning out of our world. Imperialism is “the practice of theories and attitudes of a dominating metropolitan centre ruling a distant territory” (Saïd, 1994, pp. 9). Countries, territories or groups of people who perform this kind of ruling are called an Empire; “a group of states and people that are ruled by a monarchy” (Stoesz, 1989). From the result of imperialism there is colonialism; “the implanting of settlements on distant territory” (Saïd, 1994, pp. 9). These two terms are important to understand, so in the next few paragraphs I will provide examples that help define Imperialism and Colonialism.
I think that each country, within itself has some form of an empire either on a micro or macro scale. Saïd says that “imperialism is a form of power that is linked through different attitudes and thoughts” (Saïd, 1994) that dominates other territories by states, colonies, people and groups.
The initial invasions also sparked huge waves of disease that killed thousands – many others were massacred” (Survival International, 2011) which resulted in the population of Aboriginals to decrease from “one million to only 60,000” (Survival International, 2011). Children were taken from their families and placed into white households that enforced them to learn a new culture and would not allow them to show any signs of the Aboriginal culture. This colonization had many negative effects on the Aboriginal people which had led to many on- going problems in society that create social inequalities, devaluation of race, and racial-slurs that are still seen today.
Colonialism usually happens because of imperialism; when a country places their people to a different territory for settlement. Colonialization is often seen as a negative connotation because it devalues and removes original cultures, traditions and practices from the primary settlers. For example, in the 1800’s the British settled in Australia, the land of the Aboriginals, and tried to take over and claim their land. The British decided that they needed a place to put their convicts so they placed them in a prison that they built in Australia. Over the years, the British settlement grew larger and larger which eventually interfered with the Aboriginals’ land. Aboriginals tried to preserve their land and culture but because of their lack of technology for weapons, the British had a greater advantage. “
The initial invasions also sparked huge waves of disease that killed thousands – many others were massacred” (Survival International, 2011) which resulted in the population of Aboriginals to decrease from “one million to only 60,000” (Survival International, 2011). Children were taken from their families and placed into white households that enforced them to learn a new culture and would not allow them to show any signs of the Aboriginal culture. This colonization had many negative effects on the Aboriginal people which had led to many on- going problems in society that create social inequalities, devaluation of race, and racial-slurs that are still seen today.
For example, Puerto Rico is a commonwealth of the United States, they are owned by the U.S., not a state of the U.S., but Puerto Ricans are U.S. citizens. In 1898 “during the Spanish-American war, Spain ceded the island to the United States, making Puerto Rico not an independent country anymore. Even though people who live in Puerto Rico are Americans, “Puerto Ricans developed many different political parties, […] which sought independence for the island” (Hispanic Division: Library of Congress, 2011) which also helped keep their autonomy. They want to remain a commonwealth territory, they want to elect their own governors, and they want to have their own freedom. There are a couple ways how the U.S. are represented in Puerto Rico; the Puerto Rican currency is in the American dollar, the American flag hangs over Puerto Rico’s capital city, and Puerto Ricans serve in the American army. The Americans are ruling the territory from a distance, making it their territory and applying their own laws and customs which is a form of the U.S. culture. I think this is a perfect example of imperialism, but to truly understand imperialism, Saïd says that we also need to focus on the relationship between literature and imperialism” (Saïd, 1994, pp.12).
There is a strong relationship between imperialism and colonialism because there cannot be colonialism without Imperialism, but Imperialism can happen on its own. They are indeed different from one another, but both having a strong effect in how the world functions. Even though the idea of Imperialism and Colonialism seems to have a negative focus, it can also have positive effects. For example, “the Colonial Governments and Missionaries introduced improved medical care to countries that did not have access to this” (Stoesz, 1989) which meant less death and improved the overall state of living. Also there were “new crops, tools, and farming methods that helped increase food production to create stronger human beings” (Stoesz, 1989). The world runs off inequalities, need to development, and need for power. Saïd’s theory is based on the fact that culture details imperialism for people all around the world and I think the results of imperialism and colonialism will create possibilities for new development, new ideas and thoughts, and a more peaceful world.
http://www.edwardtodonnell.com/teachers_presentations_us.htm
How can you support the idea that "the results of imperialism and colonialism will create possibilities for new development, new ideas and thoughts, and a more peaceful world", when in fact many present civil conflicts, specifically across Africa, are rooted in European colonization of the continent? Perhaps the argument for more development was, at the time, a common excuse to promote the occupation of these foreign lands, but I would argue that instead of promoting new development and peace, all we did was pillage the countries for their natural resources, enslave their people, and destroy their homes.
ReplyDeleteToday, these countries are independent, but are still fighting civil wars due to structural problems left over from former colonization. I would also argue that we are entering an era of a new type of colonization, one where the occupier is not a foreign state, but a handful of multinational corporations, seeking to exploit the few remaining resources these countries still managed to hang on to.
Jason, you make some very interesting points and I do agree with you on this. BUT I also think that there is always chance for positive change. Like I said in the relflection, there is always a negative and positive effect, but there is definately potential for the creation of new development, new thoughts and ideas and a more peacuful world. I'm not saying that colonialism and imperialism don't create problems--because they do, but they also solve problems. Im saying that because of these movements, we open the world to different opportunities that allow us to explore different possibilities that can benefit both sides
ReplyDeleteOk you're right. They're definitely benefits and opportunities that arise from colonization, however I really can't agree with your comment that it (equally) benefits both sides.
ReplyDeletePerhaps we see this differently since I tend to think of the colonization of Africa by the powerful European nations when discussing this topic, while you are clearly looking at it more comprehensively and including less obvious examples, such as Puerto Rico. I guess you've just taken the time to look more closely at the concept and apply it in more abstract scenarios.
Yes i have.. but you do have a point and im not saying that your wrong, im just saying that there is equal potential for positive outcomes!
ReplyDeleteBut do you think that the coloniation of Africa could ever change for the better and have a more positive connotation? I think in years it will change, but very slowly.
It could always change for the better, but I think it would have to largely be driven by action in the developed world, as we are primarily the ones funding, encouraging and enabling the conflicts to take place. It is interesting to see what is taking place in some countries now, as they begin to sort out long standing leadership issues. Perhaps as the years roll by they will begin to slowly develop politically to more stable independent nations and then we could see some strong positive change!
ReplyDeleteHere is my comment of your essay on imperalism and colonialism .
ReplyDeleteIf it's peace you want...
I'm going to pass along a quote for you to think about from one of the most brilliant human beings to ever grace our planet.
"Where there is power, there is not love."
C.G.Jung
I'd like to add to that "where there is no love there can be no peace."
I would highly recommend you read anything you can by this man. I would also recommend you research and read what you can on Ghandi.
Both imperialism and colonialism have left a long trail of misery for many and we need to find another way forward. There needs to be respect for the autonomy of the "other" and yet still a sharing of ideas, technology and culture in a way that does not create inequalities for any participant. A tall order you may say, but I believe it to be possible, especially, with the bright young minds and hearts of your generation. We need you to be inspired enough to crack open our old "isms" and create a new way of being.
Peace within, peace between and peace among.
I'm looking forward to reading your other essays.
Cheers,
Marjorie MacKay
(sent to my e-mail, comment posted with the permission of Marjorie)
I completely agree with your comment "where there is no love there can be no peace, and where there is power, there is not love".. It is so true... because power creates inequalities about class, race, ehtnicity, etc.
ReplyDeleteConflict socialization focuses on the inequal distribution of power in a society. But power can be a positive thing... soemthing that can help people and guide them if it is needed.